Boundary evidence
Document inbound APIs, batch triggers, and admin tools per domain capability. If two teams mutate the same tables weekly, the cut is not ready.

Programming consulting for microservices architecture—scoped engagements and advisory sessions from Chonburi, serving teams that need clearer service boundaries and operable deployment patterns.
Our checklist-led work starts with what your runtime actually does today: synchronous chains, shared databases, and deployment units that no longer match team ownership. We map those facts to candidate service cuts, not to a generic “cloud native” slide deck.
Each item below is something we validate in discovery workshops and short architecture reviews—whether you are extracting a payment path, isolating inventory writes, or untangling a reporting pipeline that still hits the primary OLTP schema.
Document inbound APIs, batch triggers, and admin tools per domain capability. If two teams mutate the same tables weekly, the cut is not ready.
Define consumer-driven checks for event payloads and REST resources before any repository split. Microservices fail quietly when schemas drift.
Confirm tracing, health endpoints, and rollback paths per deployable unit. A service boundary you cannot observe is only a folder rename.

We read your modules, CI pipelines, and container definitions to see where coupling hides. Recommendations reference concrete repos, ports, and migration steps your engineers can schedule.
You share runtime topology, team map, and the change that forced the architecture conversation. We confirm scope fits a bounded engagement.
Workshops cover synchronous calls, data ownership, and failure modes. We capture risks that block safe service extraction.
You receive a written cut plan with sequencing, contract notes, and observability gaps—ready for engineering estimation.
Optional sessions support implementation questions as teams open repositories and adjust deployment pipelines.
We do not sell licenses or packaged SaaS tiers. Programming consulting here means hands-on architecture guidance tied to your microservices transition, priced per engagement after scope is agreed.
When Kubernetes clusters exist but services still deploy as a monolith tarball, we help align repository splits with how pods and jobs actually run.

Short advisory blocks answer questions about saga patterns, idempotent consumers, and API versioning without hiring a full-time role.
Neutral evidence: engagements are described by activity—workshops, repository reviews, written briefs—not by invented client logos or ratings.
Primary delivery is consulting: architecture decisions, sequencing, and review of pull requests you author. Extended implementation pairing can be scoped separately.
We stay stack-agnostic at the boundary level—HTTP, messaging, containers—while reading your actual languages and frameworks during reviews.
Fees depend on engagement length and depth. We confirm pricing in writing before work starts; nothing on this site is a binding quote.
Call +66-38-000-2314 or send a note through the contact form with your current deployment sketch.
Open contact formWe store only your cookie choice on this device. No analytics or third-party tracking runs on this site. Cookie notice